Euler is a license-free lending agreement developed on Ethereum founded by Michael Bentley, a researcher at Oxford University. The development company is Euler XYZ. Euler XYZ won the Encode Club’s “Spark” college hackathon in 2020, and subsequently won a $800,000 seedbitcoin cash hard fork round led by Lemniscap. Other participating funds include LAUNCHub Ventures, CMT Digital, Difference Ventures, Block0 and Cluster. And Luke Youngblood, an influential Coinbase angel investor. On August 25, 2021, the project announced that it has received a new round of investment of 8 million US dollars led by Paradigm. Other investors include Lemniscap and individual investor Anthony Sassano (The Daily Gwei), and Bankless founder Ryan Sean Adams With David Hoffman, Synthetix founders Kain Warwick, Hasu (Uncommon Core podcast).
In recent months, some other "play while earning" mode games have become more and more popular, such as CryptoBlades, Zed Run, Cometh, REVV, etc. In fact, in the "play while earning" mode games have obtained orders. After the jaw-dropping success, this game revolution is very meaningful for big-name game developers. This trend cannot be ignored, and the futureThe future may see some mature game industry participants begin to incorporate these ideas into their games and bring this game model to a wider audience.bitcoin chart dailyfxGaming is an industry that covers the world: There are currently more than 2.7 billion gamers in the world, mainly in Asia, Europe and Latin America. In addition, games are firmly integrated into the daily lives of many people: 60% of Americans play video games in some form every day, and video game streaming has 1.2 billion viewers every year. For example, Fortnite is a popular product of Epic Games. Last year, there were more than 350 million live players per month and generated 5.1 billion U.S. dollars in revenue, which shows that even a single game can achieve great success. Some analysts predict that the value of the gaming industry will exceed US$300 billion in the next few years.
However, despite the promising development trajectory of the game field, there are still three major shackles:Shackle one, traditional game players don't really "own" anything. Players mainly buy clothing, weapons, props, etc. on in-game items, but even so, last year's consumption in this area still exceeded US$50 billion. However, in addition to improving player performance and game fun, these game items cannot be used for any other purpose, nor can they be sold, lent or mortgaged for any game items purchased by themselves. These purchase transactions are not real investments.Shackle two, the interoperability between traditional games is very limited. To a large extent, many games on the current market are still walled gardens: they are independent of different "game worlds" and have their own items and experiences. Of course, this problem is not surprising! Game developers want to gain complete independent control over their own creative efforts, but what if game developers can collaborate with each other in more complex ways?Shackle three, traditional games lack business model options. At this stage, more than 80% of total digital game revenue comes from free games (or "freemium games"). In some successful paid games, most of them only get income through the purchase of skins, which will also limit the design space of some developers. Form follows function. As more game developers launch new business models (such as secondary NFT sales commissions), new game forms will also appear.Why the "Playing and Earning" game can get a big explosion
In fact, there are five major trends that have driven the explosion of "play while earning" games:Trend 1: The blockchain network continues to expand. Remember the network congestion caused by the "crypto cat" CryptoKitties game in 2017? But now, with the emergence of the second-layer Ethereum expansion protocol, a new high-throughput blockchain, and other scalability solutions, the development of blockchain native games has a solid foundation;According to reports from Axies, top PvP players can earn up to 600 SLP per day; but for ordinary players, they can earn up to 200 SLP. For Filipino players, this is a work to improve their lives.
Economic modelAxie Infinity is a dual Token mechanism, and AXS, as a governance Token, clarifies the profit of the agreement. And the project party needs to increase prices in the secondary market through AXS, return part of the profits to the game and raise the SLP to extend the life of the game. SLP is a reward earned by players through the game and a core consumable for breeding Axie. And Axie infinity did not invest in marketing, but allowed players to retain most of their value, giving the game more opportunities for expansion.Good news for investors & partnersIn late June 2021, Mark Cuban and Alexis Ohanian participated in a US$7.5 million Series A financing. Sky Mavis is also supported by major game publisher Ubisoft, and Axie Infinity has joined the Entrepreneurs Lab incubator project initiated by Ubisoft.
Case: OpenseaOpensea's agreement income calculation is relatively simple, and it charges a 2.5% handling fee. On September 12, Opensea’s agreement revenue reached $1.2 million.
Aave is a DeFi protocol that uses a liquidity pool to provide lending services, stable interest rates and lightning loans.In Aave v1, the borrower pays the lender the borrowing interest rate. When users borrow assets, they need to pay 0.00001% of the loan amount as the interest rate, which is the agreement service fee. 20% of this fee will be used to provide financial support for Aave's referral program, and the remaining 80% will be transferred to the agreement. In addition, when borrowers apply for flash loans, they also need to pay 0.09% of the loan amount as expenses. 70% of this money is used by the lender, and the remaining 30% will be allocated between the recommender and Aave based on the "28%" ratio.Uniswap's main operating income is transaction fees. In Uniswap V1, users will be charged 0.3% of the transaction value (GMV) each time they exchange tokens. Starting from Uniswap V2, the agreement splits the transaction fee of the above-mentioned "0.3% of the transaction volume", in which the liquidity provider will receive 0.25% of the transaction volume income, and the remaining 0.05% will go to UNI token holders. Someone. For V3, when adding liquidity, there are 3 levels of fee rate to choose from: 0.05%, 0.3% and 1%.Uniswap's agreement income needs to be added to V2 and V3, because the agreement fee structure of v2 and v3 is different. The income generated by Uniswap is transferred to retained earnings to maintain Uniswap's ecology and operations, or passed to UNI holders through a destruction mechanism similar to MarkerDao.
Through this article, we have a deeper understanding of how agreements work and the value they generate. Next, let's talk about the role of agreement income in project analysis. Generally, agreement income can be used for asset evaluation, in a comparable analysis to assist investors in judging which projects are undervalued or overvalued. It mainly adopts three indicators: market-to-sales ratio P/S (market value to income ratio), price-to-earnings ratio P/E (market value to earnings ratio), etc. Although these indicators are not the absolute best judgment criteria, they are very helpful in comparing NFT projects of the same type.In traditional finance, the P/E ratio is the ratio of the stock price to the company’s earnings. As a measure of how many years it takes for a company to obtain its market value, the P/E ratio reflects to a certain extent investors’ expectations of a company’s future profitability. In the blockchain world, the P/E ratio is the ratio of market value to earnings. It can reflect the expectation of future income and cash flow, one of the tools to measure the efficiency of assets, and it can also be used as an indicator when comparing projects.About #click to browse
This research report belongs to Mint Ventures' # series scanning series. Compared with the #深研报 series which conducts comprehensive analysis of individual projects, the focus of #Scan series articles is to focus on the development trend of the search, and the horizontal comparison of the growing projects. From the above, we can see the unique dynamics and potential projects in the business.Focus
About #click to browseThis issue# focuses on topics of concern, especially the new public chain camp and the Ethereum camp to report on the development and game trends of the project.
The story project is one of the most important in the history of the Defi field, with a long history of a large number of white horse-level projects, such as the early days of Aave and Compound MakerDAO. With the rapid development of the new public chain, a large number of introduction projects scattered in the new public chain and multiple chains have emerged.In addition to the differentiation of the deployment of public chains, the business types of lending projects have evolved from basic lending and stable currency lending to new businesses such as leveraged mining lending with targeted scenarios. In addition, credit lending mainly for institutional-level customers, risk grading agreements derived from existing lending agreements, and interest rate derivatives are also gradually growing.Although many loan projects have mature business models and abundant cash flow income, there is still huge room for innovation in this industry, and it is still possible to give birth to new giants such as Aave. It is precisely because of this that lending projects are still one of the key directions of the DeFi entrepreneurial team.After scanning the newly born projects in the past 2 months, we selected 4 more representative loan projects for key analysis. They either broke out rapidly in business or had unique mechanism innovations. Through this research Report, we try to answer the following questions:What is the actual business situation of these projects?What are their product positioning, mechanism or token design innovations?
For those fast-growing projects, what are the sources of growth and how sustainable are they?The track value of the loan business
Like the trading platform, the lending project is also the basic liquidity layer of the crypto world. It plays the role of a bank in the crypto world. Its essence is to coordinate the supply and demand of funds from multiple parties and match liquidity across periods. The business ceiling of this track will expand simultaneously with the expansion of the scale of the encryption business.On the other hand, the demand for matching funds is long-term, and there is no doubt about the sustainability of this track. Although the current funding needs for encrypted lending mainly come from investment leverage, arbitrage, and short-term capital turnover, with the progress of compliance, the channel between the traditional world and encrypted finance will eventually be opened, and the real-world collateral ( The introduction of lending platforms such as real estate and corporate credits, and issuing loans to non-crypto players through stablecoins are all things that are gradually happening, which will bring more room for development to the industry.
Whether as entrepreneurs, investors or ordinary users in this industry, the track of crypto lending is far from the final form. There are still a large number of new products and rich investment opportunities worth looking forward to.As of September 16, 2021, Defi's total TVL has hit a new high since May, reaching 180 billion U.S. dollars. Although the proportion of borrowed TVL has declined, it still occupies the bulk, with a TVL of approximately US$50 billion.
In terms of business volume, the established projects Aave, Compound and MakerDAO still firmly occupy the top three positions, and their TVL accounts for more than 70% of the entire lending market.However, the rise of emerging lending projects is also amazing. The top ten projects in TVL include Anchor ($3.12 billion) on Terra, Benqi ($1.23 billion) on the avalanche agreement, and Qubit ($400 million) on BSC. Unlike the big three lending giants that originated in Ethereum, these fast-growing lending forces all come from Ethereum’s competitors, which is the hottest narrative at the moment-the new public chain.What is even more surprising is that in addition to the earlier launch time of Anchor (in March this year), the official launch time of the other two projects is only less than one month.In terms of the type of lending business, whether it is the number of projects or the amount of funds, basic lending projects account for a higher proportion, followed by leveraged mining lending projects, and other relatively new ones such as risk-graded interest rate products. The business volume is currently relatively small.
Project StatusProduct launch time: August 24, 2021
Qubit is a decentralized currency market that uses a mainstream borrowing capital pool model. Qubit's development and operation team is the team behind Pancakebunny-Mound, which was first deployed on BSC, and there are plans for multi-chain expansion in the future.Project Features
The main features of Qubit compared to other basic lending projects are:Its token QBT can increase the rate of return of deposit users after lock-up, which is called "Boost" function
Qubit is part of Mound’s product matrix, and Mound’s products are highly combinableQubit does not support lightning loan functionBusiness conditionsBusiness data
Token value captureCore function: revenue acceleration
Up to now, the main function of QBT is to obtain qScore after lock-up. Through qScore, deposit users can accelerate their deposit income (from the increase in QBT deposit subsidies).This mechanism is similar to Curve's Locker mechanism. Curve's Locker function and economic model consolidate its original competitive advantage and increase the switching cost of liquidity providers and investors. It is a very eye-catching design. However, when the mechanism is applied to a loan agreement, will it still have a good effect? The author remains skeptical about this.
First of all, the reason why some people are willing to lock up the position of Curve's token CRV for a long time after buying it is caused by Curve's strong position in the stable asset business chain and the competition for the governance power of Curve by multiple participants. Because governance power on the Curve platform means two core resources: the baton of liquidity and the accelerator of revenue.Since the issuer of stable consideration assets (stable currency, stETH and other pledge certificates and renBTC and other BTC cross-chain assets are stable consideration assets), they have great requirements on the stability and transaction depth of their operating assets, so they choose Curve to list. Assets and attracting market-making liquidity are very rigid requirements, which creates a strong position of Curve relative to asset operators, which is determined by the business positioning of its Top1 stable asset exchange platform.